FROM THE RELEASED TABLES

CASCADE

Two results in the data Anthropic released, neither of which is a re-sort of their ranking score. The lab result still depends on which program drew the protein. And for two tight binders, that ranking names a toxin the protein does not bind.

FINDING

The score does not erase the tool

10 of the 17 binders came from 44 designs, the ones drawn by RFdiffusion3 or Genie 3. A random 44 of the 211 would hold about 3.5. Inside the designs that scored 0.90 or better, PXDesign is 0 for 13 and Genie 3 is 4 for 9. Same score band. Different tools.

ToolBindersScore ≥ 0.90
Genie 35/274/9
RFdiffusion35/172/12
Mosaic2/552/4
PXDesign2/480/13
Proteina-Complexa2/122/6
Fusion1/32—
FreeBindCraft0/120/4
BoltzGen0/40/3

Cn2-B1 and AaHII-B1, the two tightest hits they reported, were both drawn by RFdiffusion3. That tool was 17 of the 211 designs ordered.

FINDING

The average names the wrong toxin

Each design was scored against all five toxins. For 14 of the 17 binders, the highest average is the toxin that bound. For these, it is not. AaHII-B2 and AaHII-B3 bind AaH II at 3.8 and 4.0 nM. The average's top toxin is LqhIII, a no-hit. ESMFold2 ipSAE, one term inside that average, names AaH II.

The seventeen

Tool is the program that drew the backbone, from the origin table.